
On September 2, the U.S. Department of Treasury published a preliminary list of 68 jobs that qualify for the “No Tax on Tips” deduction. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) created a $25,000 deduction for tipped income. The deduction applies to single individuals with incomes up to $150,000 or married couples filing jointly with incomes up to $300,000.
The list is divided into eight industry categories. The release states, "Treasury and the IRS anticipate that the official proposed list will be substantially the same as this preliminary list."
The list is quite broad. Tax Foundation Senior Policy Analyst Alex Muresianu stated, "This is a much broader set of occupations than I think some were expecting. As such, the policy could end up being more expensive than previously anticipated." The "No Tax on Tips" provision is available from 2025 until 2028. The federal government estimated the cost would be $32 billion over the next decade.
There are eight principal categories for the occupations. A non-exhaustive list of jobs within each category is as follows:
In Buckelew Farm LLC et al. v. Commissioner; No. 24-13268 (11th Cir. 2025), the Eleventh Circuit issued an unpublished decision upholding a Tax Court decision that reduced a conservation easement charitable deduction by approximately 90%. The taxpayer was also liable for a 40% valuation misstatement penalty.
Between 1998 and 2006, Buckelew Farm, LLC (Buckelew) acquired around 1,500 acres in Jones County, Georgia for approximately $4 million. The property was subsequently offered for sale for $9 million, but a timber management organization estimated the timber value to be approximately $6 million.
Buckelew was in contact with attorney James M. Adams, III to discuss a conservation easement charitable deduction plan. They organized Big Knoll Farms, LLC to purchase the property for $6 million. Adams obtained an appraisal estimate that the valuation of the property for purposes of the easement could be approximately $60 million.
The valuation depended upon approval of a subdivision plan by Jones County’s Zoning Director, Tim Pitrowski. After an initial meeting, he issued an opinion letter that indicated it was "more likely than not" the land subdivision plan would be approved. However, at the Tax Court trial, Pitrowski stated he did not have full information on the plan, and the added information would change his opinion.
Taxpayer appraiser Daly Hayter, Jr. valued the property at $50.48 million. Based on a "before and after" determination, Hayter claimed the charitable easement deduction would be $47.6 million. Buckelew deeded a conservation easement to the Southeast Regional Land Conservancy, Inc. and reported a charitable deduction of $47.57 million.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a Final Partnership Administrative Adjustment (FPAA) and denied the charitable deduction. The Tax Court proceeding resulted in three holdings. The Tax Court determined there was a valid charitable conservation easement deduction, the value was grossly overstated, and therefore a 40% penalty under Section 6662(a) was applicable and the IRS fraud claim was not valid.
The key issue for the valuation was the question of the methodology and whether a development plan was legally impermissible. The taxpayer asserted that the Tax Court was wrong in claiming that the development plan was legally impermissible and objected to procedural actions.
The taxpayer did not contest the determination by the Tax Court that rejected the discounted cash flow method of the taxpayer appraiser and accepted the comparable valuation methodology of IRS appraiser Zac Ryan.
Because the only valuation issue raised by the taxpayer was whether or not the use was legally impermissible, the Eleventh Circuit determined the Tax Court valuation was appropriate. Valuation is defined as "the highest and most profitable use for which the property is adaptable and needed or likely to be needed in the reasonably near future." Even if the subdivision use was permissible, the taxpayer valuation by Hayter was not acceptable. The Tax Court determined his valuation was "firmly planted somewhere in the realm of fantasy."
The basic test of valuation is to determine the highest and best use. If the proposed use is likely to be deemed risky by a hypothetical buyer, then it will not qualify as the highest and best use. Therefore, the other procedural issues were within the bounds of the harmless-error review of appellate courts, and the key question was valuation. The Eleventh Circuit determined the Tax Court decision on valuation was correct.
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) included multiple tax changes. However, there are a number of potential tax issues that will be presented to Congress in September. These may include some changes that affect nonprofits and individuals.
There are three possible options for Congress. It may pass a second reconciliation bill, could craft a bipartisan tax bill or create an extenders package. Some or all of these six agenda items could be included in a 2025 bill.
Editor's Note: The most likely tax update will be a change in the capital gains tax exclusion for a home sale. The exclusion of $250,000 for single individuals and $500,000 for married couples was created in 1997. Many of the exclusions and credits that were previously created have been adjusted for inflation. The inflation from 1997 to 2025 would result in an increase to $503,000 for single individuals or $1,006,000 for married couples. Therefore, it seems probable that at some point the home-sale exclusions will be adjusted for inflation.
The IRS has announced the Applicable Federal Rate (AFR) for September of 2025. The AFR under Sec. 7520 for the month of September is 4.8%. The rates for August of 4.8% or July of 5.0% also may be used. The highest AFR is beneficial for charitable deductions of remainder interests. The lowest AFR is best for lead trusts and life estate reserved agreements. With a gift annuity, if the annuitant desires greater tax-free payments the lowest AFR is preferable. During 2025, pooled income funds in existence less than three tax years must use a 4.0% deemed rate of return. Charitable gift receipts should state, “No goods or services were provided in exchange for this gift and the nonprofit has exclusive legal control over the gift property.”
How To Protect Yourself From Identity Thieves